Week In Review
January 28 2013
by Bill Onasch
Dense Top–Sieve Below
I don’t blame the hard working professionals belonging to AFGE but nearly all news these days from
the Bureau of Labor Statistics is bad. This past week an annual report on union membership revealed
union density–the unionized share of the workforce, now standing at 11.3 percent–is the lowest in
ninety-seven years. Since there were few public sector unions in 1916, it’s safe to conclude that the
present 6.6 percent density in the private sector is the lowest since anybody has kept track.
In many respects density is a more telling indicator of union health than the total number of union
members. Membership rolls can fluctuate due to market cycles largely beyond control of traditional
collective bargaining.
Other factors have long been in play that affect both measures.
* Since Bill Clinton drove through NAFTA in 1993, later followed up by the China trade deal,
unionized employers in North America have offshored the work of millions.
* Conversely, capital from outside the USA opened “transplants” here–rapidly winning market share
in auto, rubber, and other industries while remaining mostly nonunion.
* And, of course, technology has greatly reduced the number of jobs in manufacturing even as the USA
remains an industrial powerhouse, and the same goes in rail and longshore despite an explosion of
global trade.
Unions can, and once did adjust to a changing composition of the workforce. One of America’s biggest
unions retains the archaic name of Teamsters. Except for UPS deliveries on Mackinac Island–where
motorized vehicles are banned–no members of this union any longer hold reins of horse-drawn wagons.
The Teamsters made the adjustment to motorized trucks. Later, prodded by organizing successes of the
Minnesota leadership that emerged after the 1934 Minneapolis strikes, the IBT expanded beyond their
traditional base of elite driver-salesmen to embrace the entire trucking and warehouse industry, inside
and out. In recent years they also attracted two major rail unions to merge in to their ranks and even
have contracts here and there in manufacturing, printing and public sector jobs.
But this union, which also suffered from decades of extensive Mob domination, failed to meet the
eventual challenge of deregulation of trucking begun in the Carter administration. The majority of big
rigs you pass on the highway today don’t have a Teamster member at the wheel. Work once done union
is now parceled out to often super-exploited independent contractors or small, unorganized outfits that
are usually vassals of bigger ones. Outside of UPS, the core of the various regional master freight
agreements has shrunk to barely critical mass. Even the great Logistics Belt in the historic union
stronghold of suburban Chicago remains mostly unorganized with only a valiant effort by the small UE
causing any grief for the warehouse bosses fronting for corporate giants such as Walmart.
The Teamsters are, of course, not the only once mighty union to have lost clout. The UAW was as
shortsighted as Big Three management in initially ignoring the inroads made by Japanese car companies
in to the North American market. After a couple of ill-conceived organizing defeats at transplants they
mostly depended on patriotic appeals to Buy American to save jobs. Their failure to organize the Big
Three’s competition led them in to partnership with the bosses to make UAW workers more
“competitive.” This was pushed to the extreme in the Obama administration dictated bankruptcy at GM
and Chrysler.
Unions did register substantial growth in the public sector in the postwar period and these have become
the majority of organized labor today. But the bipartisan austerity drive has slashed hundreds of
thousands of these jobs at every level of government, many more have been privatized , and anti-union
legislation in such union bastions as Michigan and Wisconsin have dealt further grievous blows. In just
the past year, 234,000 public sector union members were lost; density declined from 37 percent to 35.9.
Overall, as the total U.S. workforce grew by 2.4 million last year union membership declined by
400,000. Total union membership now stands at 14.3 million–less than the membership involved in the
merger of the AFL with the CIO fifty-eight years ago.
There are some exceptions to this gloom. National Nurses United grew through some solid
organizatizing victories. Some of those, along with success by other unions in organizing immigrant
workers, contributed to a modest improvement in California union density.
On the national level, there is only one positive aspect to this latest report–despite the beating our unions
have taken, workers are still substantially better off being in a union. Union members ha median weekly
earnings of 943 dollars last year (about 49,000 annually), compared with 742 (about 38,600 annually),
for comparable nonunion workers. That’s the main reason why employers still hate them and a major
reason why we should still cherish them.
While our unions are dissipating, the upper strata of union officialdom remains as dense as a Black
Hole. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka was ready to make a refreshing beverage by adding sugar
to the present crop of sour lemons .
“What will define the labor movement of the future, however, is not assaults or the changing economy,
but how working people come together to respond to them. We enter 2013 with our eyes open and
understand that these challenges offer real opportunities for working people to reshape the future.”
He goes on with many more fine, inspiring words. They are the same words he brought with him when
he left his post as head of the Miners to win election as an “insurgent” running mate of John Sweeney,
ousting the then Old Guard in the AFL-CIO in 1995. But there’s a difference today. Trumka the Miner
used his oratory to motivate great class battles in the coal fields, taking on both the operators and their
servants in government. Today’s Trumka puts his rhetorical talents to use as the most loyal spin-doctor
at the service of the White House and congressional Democrats.
Our unions are not yet dead but they are clearly ailing. We won’t survive many more of brother
Trumka’s “opportunities.” To reshape our future we need to reverse the current equation by putting
clarity at the top to gain density below.
Will the Real Sierra Club Please Sit Down
Regular readers know I have long had a turbulent association with America’s biggest environmental
group, twice leaving the Sierra Club in protest. I’m not quite ready for a third try but I am impressed
with a major shift in Club policy. For the first time in its 120 year history, the group that has focused
on lobbying, partnering with corporations, and occasional lawsuits, is now getting involved in mass
action coalitions. More than that–they are even preparing to participate in nonviolent civil disobedience.
The CD will take place at a national protest in Washington February 17, over the Presidents Day
Weekend, demanding the President nix the Keystone XL pipeline. While defending their old traditions,
executive director Michael Brune says,
“We are watching a global crisis unfold before our eyes, and to stand aside and let it happen -- even
though we know how to stop it -- would be unconscionable....time is running out, and there is so much
more to do. The stakes are enormous. At this point, we can't afford to lose a single major battle. That's
why the Sierra Club's Board of Directors has for the first time endorsed an act of peaceful civil
disobedience.”
In Brief...
¶ Shortly after the release of the BLS report a Circuit Court of Appeals ruling declared President
Obama’s “recess appointments” of National Labor Relations Board members invalid. Unless reversed
on appeal to the Supreme Court, this means there is no functioning NLRB and more than 300 decisions
by Obama appointments are vacated. We’ve never been able to count on the NLRB for much but no
Board at all means the bosses can violate the few rights we have with impunity.
¶ From AP, “Millions of smokers could be priced out of health insurance because of tobacco penalties
in President Barack Obama's health care law, according to experts who are just now teasing out the
potential impact of a little-noted provision in the massive legislation.”
¶ With all the media attention given to “Right to Life” demonstrations, choreographed by church
hierarchy around the anniversary of Roe v Wade, you would think there was an upsurge in opposition
to a woman’s right to choose. In fact public opinion is just the opposite. An NBC/Wall Street Journal
Poll shows seventy percent support the historic abortion rights ruling. That’s the highest approval rating
since polling on the question began in 1989.
¶ From the AFL-CIO Blog, “About 1.7 million workers in the United States each year are exposed to
silica dust and run the risk of developing silicosis, lung cancer and other debilitating diseases. Public
health experts estimate that 280 workers die each year from silicosis—and thousands more develop
silicosis as a result of workplace exposures. But a proposed workplace standard on silica dust exposure
from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has been delayed for nearly two years
as the Office of Management and Budget reviews the proposed standard. You can help spur action on
controlling this deadly workplace hazard by signing a White House ‘We the People’ petition urging the
Obama administration to move forward with the silica dust standard.”
¶ From the CBC this morning, “MPs are set to return to the House of Commons today as Idle No More
protesters plan to march to Parliament Hill for a world day of action. The protesters are opposed to
environmental law changes adopted after the House of Commons and Senate passed Bill C-45.” A
recent poll shows more than half of Canadians think change in Federal policy toward First Nations,
Inuit and Métis people is urgent. An NDP (labor party) MP has introduced a bill to force the
government to respect indigenous rights.
That’s all for this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment